[PATCH] phy: qcom-m31: Fix error code in probe()

[Varadarajan Narayanan]

On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:54:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This accidentally returns the wrong variable.  It should be "qphy->vreg"
> instead of "qphy->phy".
>
> Fixes: 08e49af50701 ("phy: qcom: Introduce M31 USB PHY driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at linaro.org>
> ---
> When we're adding new drivers then we should use the new driver
> prefix instead of the subsystem prefix.  For example:
>
>  Bad: [PATCH] phy: qcom: Introduce M31 USB PHY driver
> Good: [PATCH] phy: qcom-m31: Introduce M31 USB PHY driver
>
> That way it's obvious to the first person who sends a bugfix
> what the driver prefix is.
>
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c
> index ed08072ca032..99d570f4142a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int m31usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>  	qphy->vreg = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdda-phy");
>  	if (IS_ERR(qphy->vreg))
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(qphy->phy),
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(qphy->vreg),
>  						"failed to get vreg\n");
>
>  	phy_set_drvdata(qphy->phy, qphy);
> --
> 2.39.2

I believe this is addressed by https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230824091345.1072650-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/

Thanks
Varada