[PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-crd: Add QMP to SuperSpeed graph

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:22:22PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 08:40:09PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-crd.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-crd.dts
[..]
> >  &mdss0_dp0_out {
> >  	data-lanes = <0 1>;
> > -	remote-endpoint = <&pmic_glink_con0_ss>;
> > +	remote-endpoint = <&usb_0_qmpphy_dp_in>;
> >  };
> 
> It's a bit hard to follow what going on when using place holder nodes
> from the dtsi like this (instead of describing all the ports directly in
> the board dts). IIRC we went a bit back and forth over this earlier and
> we already use this scheme for the display port controllers, so I guess
> this is the price we pay for being consistent.
> 

I agree, this is why I argued in favour of keeping the of_graphs
together in a single node. But as long as we label things appropriately
it's pretty ok - and the alternative would be yet another undocumented
"rule".

So let's stick with this...

> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
[..]
> > +			ports {
> > +				#address-cells = <1>;
> > +				#size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +				port at 0 {
> > +					reg = <0>;
> > +
> > +					usb_0_qmpphy_out: endpoint {};
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				port at 1 {
> > +					reg = <1>;
> > +
> > +					usb_0_qmpphy_dp_in: endpoint {};
> > +				};
> > +			};
> >  		};
> 
> The binding describes three ports, where dp-in is port 2.
> 
> Perhaps you don't need to describe ss-in yet, but shouldn't the port
> numbers match? Should some of these be described as required in the
> binding?
> 

This should certainly be port at 2, thanks for spotting.

Regards,
Bjorn