[PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: Add starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx

Changhuang Liang changhuang.liang at starfivetech.com
Tue Apr 18 23:10:41 PDT 2023



On 2023/4/19 2:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 1:42 PM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:41:23AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 13/04/2023 04:34, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>>>>>>> +  lane_maps:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why did this appear? Underscores are not allowed. It looks like you
>>>>>>> re-implement some standard property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will change to lane-maps.
>>>>>> Yes, according to Vinod advice, lane mapping table use device tree
>>>>>> to parse makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, I have a feeling that I saw such property, so you should dig into
>>>>> existing and in-flight bindings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A standard property? Like "clocks" or "resets"?
>>>
>>> Like lane-polarities now submitted to one MIPI.
>>>
>>
>> data-lanes perhaps?
> 
> Except that is for the controller's endpoint rather than the phy.
> Presumably if the controller knows the mapping, then it can tell the
> phy if it needs the information. IOW, don't just copy 'data-lanes' to
> the phy. Follow the normal patterns.
> 
> Rob

I am not sure if phy can fetch from the other controller's endpoint. In 
addition, like our JH7110 SoC, it have data-lanes configure (data-lanes = <1 2>)
in csi2rx controller, but this data-lanes configure is not appropriate to phy, 
maybe they are independent. 



More information about the linux-phy mailing list