[PATCH 00/12] Re-introduce Exynos4212 support and add Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 boards

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/04/2023 14:37, Artur Weber wrote:
> On 16/04/2023 12:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/04/2023 12:49, Artur Weber wrote:
>>> On 16/04/2023 12:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 16/04/2023 12:26, Artur Weber wrote:
>>>>> On 16/04/2023 12:16, Artur Weber wrote:
>>>>>> This patches re-introduces the Exynos4212 platform and adds support
>>>>>> for the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 series of tablets that uses it:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     - Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 WiFi (SM-T310/lt01wifi)
>>>>>>     - Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 3G (SM-T311/lt013g)
>>>>>>     - Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 LTE (SM-T315/lt01lte)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What works:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     - Display and backlight
>>>>>>     - Touchscreen (without touchkeys)
>>>>>>     - GPIO buttons, hall sensor
>>>>>>     - WiFi and Bluetooth
>>>>>>     - USB, fuel gauge, charging (partial)
>>>>>>     - Accelerometer and magnetometer
>>>>>>     - WiFi model only: light sensor
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset depends on "[PATCH 0/3] Add Samsung S6D7AA0 panel
>>>>> controller driver" for the display panel support for the Samsung Galaxy
>>>>> 3 8.0 boards.
>>>>
>>>> Why? DTS and ARM code cannot depend on driver changes. Please rework
>>>> your patchsets to remove any of such dependencies.
>>>
>>> Ah, that makes sense. I'll re-send the patchset in a second with the
>>> panel node removed.
>>
>> I am sorry, I don't understand. Why would you remove anything from DTS?
>> Are bindings NAKed?
> 
> The dependency display panel patchset introduces the panel and its 
> bindings, which in turn are included in the Tab3 DTSI. It was submitted 
> at roughly the same time as this series, and hasn't been fully reviewed 
> or merged as of writing. (I have seen your comments on that patchset, 
> and I will be addressing them shortly.) So the bindings haven't been 
> explicitly ACKed yet (assuming you mean the Acked-by reply).

So there is no dependency. DTS is (and must be) independent of driver.
You need to mention in the patch (under --- ) or cover letter that it
uses new bindings which are documented under the given link.

> 
> In response to:
> 
>  > Please rework your patchsets to remove any of such dependencies.
> 
> I suggested that I could remove the panel node from the DTSI for the 
> time being. The intent was to submit it in a separate patch later, once 
> the display is reviewed/merged, and thus actually available in the 
> kernel; this way, the two patches could be reviewed and merged separately.

No need, there is no dependency. Just remove such remarks from cover letter.


Best regards,
Krzysztof