Aw: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe v3 nodes to BPI-R2-Pro

[Frank Wunderlich]

> Gesendet: Samstag, 27. August 2022 um 10:56 Uhr
> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>

> On 27/08/2022 11:50, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. August 2022 um 08:50 Uhr
> >> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> >> On 25/08/2022 22:38, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> >>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w at public-files.de>
> >
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
> >>> index 93d383b8be87..40b90c052634 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
> >>> @@ -86,6 +86,66 @@ vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
> >>>  		vin-supply = <&dc_12v>;
> >>>  	};
> >>>
> >>> +	pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 {
> >>
> >> Use consistent naming, so if other nodes have "regulator" suffix, use it
> >> here as well.
> >
> > only these 3 new have the suffix:
> >
> > vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05-regulator
> > vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie-regulator
> > vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff-regulator
> >
> > so i would drop it there...
> >
> > so i end up with (including existing ones to compare):
> >
> > vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys
> > vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys
> > pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9
> > pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8
> > vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05
> > vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie
> > vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff
> > vcc5v0_usb: vcc5v0_usb
> > vcc5v0_usb_host: vcc5v0-usb-host
> > vcc5v0_usb_otg: vcc5v0-usb-otg
> >
> > is this ok?
> >
> > maybe swap avdd* and pcie30 part to have voltage in front of function.
> >
>
> I prefer all of them have regulator suffix. I think reasonable is also
> to rename the old ones and then add new ones with suffix.

ok, will change these to add -regulator in name (not label). and then rename the others in separate Patch outside of the series.

so basicly here
-       pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 {
+       pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9-regulator {
-       pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8 {
+       pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8-regulator {

how about the swapping of pcie30 and the avddXvY? In Schematic they are named PCIE30_AVDD_0V9 / PCIE30_AVDD_1V8, so better leave this?

avdd0v9-pcie30 will be more similar to the other regulators, but inconsistent with Schematic.

regards Frank