[PATCH 2/2] phy: samsung-ufs: support exynosauto ufs phy driver

[Chanho Park]

> >        - samsung,exynos7-ufs-phy
> > +      - samsung,exynosauto-ufs-phy
> 
> I would prefer real product ID (taken from registers or vendor kernel),
> not a marketing name "Auto" because it's too generic, unspecified, too
> much as wildcard.
> 
> If vendor kernel does not define name or product ID is also not specific,
> then it should include a version - so "autov9".

"samsung,exynosautov9-ufs-phy" can be a full name which can describe the SoC.

> I know that Exynos7 UFS did it but it was wrong. Headers should not define
> structures. What if a header needs to be included in different
> objects/units?
> 
> This should be probably a separate file (C file). Something like we did
> for Exynos PMU (drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h).

It makes sense to me. I'll move the structures from "phy-exynos7-ufs.h"
to "phy-exynos7-ufs.c" and create "phy-exynosautov9-ufs.c".

Best Regards,
Chanho Park