[PATCH 05/14] nvmet: get rid of the extra variable

[Chaitanya Kulkarni]

On 8/10/20 16:13, Keith Busch wrote:
> The odd looking part is mixing "likely()" and "unlikely()" in the same
> conditional.
> 

Actually The sg_cnt check can be moved into nvmet_passthru_map_sg() then 
we can get rid of the odd looking likely() and unlikely()
and have only one call.