[GIT PULL] nvme patches for 4.11
Daniel Roschka
danielroschka at phoenitydawn.de
Wed Feb 22 14:10:33 PST 2017
On Wednesday, 22. February 2017, 20:41:11 CET you wrote:
> A few issues with this:
>
> - It throws a merge conflict. No big deal, that was easy enough
> to fix up.
>
> - What is this based on? Looks like some version of my for-next,
> but ends up duplicating 4 patches from me. I don't remember
> if I rebased my for-next this time around, but I often do. It's
> not a stable branch like the for-4.xx/topic branches.
>
> - Out of 22 patches, one commit reverts another commit. That should
> just have been squashed.
>
> I ended up simply fixing all of that up, and generating the patches
> and applying. Otherwise the whole history would have been a mess.
Urgs, I don't know what went wrong with the pull request from Sagi, but at
least the change in there I authored is fundamently different from what I
submitted!
Looking at git://git.infradead.org/nvme.git nvme-4.11, instead of my original
patch adding a device ID for another NVMe controller for MacBooks, this branch
replaces the original entry! That'd be a regression for all MacBook8,1 out
there!
See http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-linus&id=4f6cc1c29b0b5d3a964d5ad0cbe7c48e6c44686f
vs. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2017-February/008323.html
How do we get that fixed?
Best,
Daniel
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list