> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 08:04:38PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> According to the surrounding goto, it is likely that 'out_destroy_sq' was >> expected here. > > s/surrounding/preceeding/ ? > > But the patch itself looks good, thanks. > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> Picked it up and reworded, thanks.