[PATCH] mtd: Avoid printing error messages on probe deferrals
Miquel Raynal
miquel.raynal at bootlin.com
Mon Mar 6 05:36:41 PST 2023
Hi Michael,
michael at walle.cc wrote on Mon, 06 Mar 2023 14:10:22 +0100:
> Am 2023-03-01 16:24, schrieb Miquel Raynal:
> > There is no reason to complain about probe errors in case of deferrals.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 10 +++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > index 0feacb9fbdac..d163c690750a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > {
> > struct device_node *node = mtd_get_of_node(mtd);
> > struct nvmem_config config = {};
> > + int ret;
> >
> > config.id = -1;
>
> just noticed that magic value. If you care replace it with NVMEM_DEVID_NONE.
Mmmh yeah.
>
> > config.dev = &mtd->dev;
> > @@ -535,12 +536,15 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> >
> > mtd->nvmem = nvmem_register(&config);
> > if (IS_ERR(mtd->nvmem)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(mtd->nvmem);
> > /* Just ignore if there is no NVMEM support in the kernel */
> > - if (PTR_ERR(mtd->nvmem) == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> > + if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> > mtd->nvmem = NULL;
> > } else {
> > - dev_err(&mtd->dev, "Failed to register NVMEM device\n");
> > - return PTR_ERR(mtd->nvmem);
> > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>
> Since you have a proper "struct device" to operate on, you can also use
> dev_err_probe() which the same but also save the reason for the deferral.
Good point. I'll update, that will make things clearer.
> -michael
>
> > + dev_err(&mtd->dev,
> > + "Failed to register NVMEM device (%d)\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > }
> > }
Thanks,
Miquèl
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list