[PATCH] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use chip_ready() for write on S29GL064N

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.

On 14.02.22 19:20, Tokunori Ikegami wrote:
> The regression issue has been caused on S29GL064N and reported it.
> Also the change mentioned is to use chip_good() for buffered write.
> So disable the change on S29GL064N and use chip_ready() as before.
> 
> Fixes: dfeae1073583("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check correct value")
> Signed-off-by: Tokunori Ikegami <ikegami.t at gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org

This is missing a "Link:" tag pointing to the report:

Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/b687c259-6413-26c9-d4c9-b3afa69ea124@pengutronix.de/

'Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst' and
'Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst' explain this in more detail. Such
tags are important for me, as it allows my regression tracking bot to
connect the report with any patches posted or committed to fix the
issue; this again allows the bot to show the current status of
regressions and automatically resolve the issue when the fix hits the
right tree.

BTW, what's the status of getting an improved fix merged? It seems the
progress slowed down quite a bit.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of
reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack
knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately
will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope
that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me
in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record
straight.

#regzbot ^backmonitor:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b687c259-6413-26c9-d4c9-b3afa69ea124@pengutronix.de/