[PATCH] mtd: ck804xrom: fix missing pci device put in error paths
James Bond
jameslouisebond at gmail.com
Fri Aug 28 22:28:40 EDT 2020
Hi Miquèl,
Thanks for your feedback.
I have just rechecked this function and find that "pdev" currently is
already put
inside ck804xrom_cleanup, so my previous patch is meaningless...
The current calling order is like:
window->pdev = pci_dev_get(pdev);
...
ck804xrom_cleanup(window)
->
pci_dev_put(window->pdev);
And sorry for bothering you.
Thanks,
James
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:46 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> James Bond <jameslouisebond at gmail.com> wrote on Fri, 21 Aug 2020
> 02:05:36 -0500:
>
> > pci_dev_get increases the refcount of "pdev".
> > In the error paths, pci_dev_put should be called
> > to handle the "pdev" and decrease the corresponding refcount.
> >
> > Fixes: 90afffc8bd79 ("[MTD] [MAPS] Support for BIOS flash chips on the nvidia ck804 southbridge")
> > Signed-off-by: James Bond <jameslouisebond at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/maps/ck804xrom.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/ck804xrom.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/ck804xrom.c
> > index 460494212f6a..16af8b5ee653 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/ck804xrom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/ck804xrom.c
> > @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static int __init ck804xrom_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > if (!window->virt) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR MOD_NAME ": ioremap(%08lx, %08lx) failed\n",
> > window->phys, window->size);
> > + pci_dev_put(pdev);
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ static int __init ck804xrom_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >
> > if (!map) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR MOD_NAME ": kmalloc failed");
> > + pci_dev_put(pdev);
> > goto out;
> > }
> > memset(map, 0, sizeof(*map));
> > @@ -295,6 +297,7 @@ static int __init ck804xrom_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > if (mtd_device_register(map->mtd, NULL, 0)) {
> > map_destroy(map->mtd);
> > map->mtd = NULL;
> > + pci_dev_put(pdev);
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
>
> I suppose in these three cases, the window->maps list will be empty and
> you will end up returning -ENODEV and the bottom of the function? If
> yes, it woudl probably be better to move these pci_dev_put() calls to
> this location.
>
> Otherwise, it might bit interesting to clean up a little bit the error
> path and perhaps have a distinct success vs. failure path.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list