MTD RAID

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 17:54 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> 
> If this was on top of UBI, the RAID would probably be a closer match,
> because then you could assume you are on top of a "reliable" media.

I think implementing RAUD within UBI makes a lot of sense. Virtual
eraseblocks could then be either duplicated across different physical
regions (like RAID1) but without having to worry about being in
precisely the same locations on each underlying device.

Mirroring and even RAID5-like configurations could also be handled. And
the user just gets a simple UBI volume that they can use as normal.

-- 
dwmw2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5760 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20160822/9ccdd3ab/attachment.bin>