[PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Add Pm25LD020 and GD25Q41B chip ID.

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 28 July 2015 at 16:33, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:07:58 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> First chip reads Pm25LD020 or Pm25L0020. Found on some WD HDD PCB.
>> Identified as PMC Pm25LD020.
>> Flash read does not return consistent data which explains why the disk
>> died.
>>
>> Second chip reads something like 25Q41BT. Found on Esspif ESP8266 based
>> ESP-01 board. Identified as Giga Devices GD25Q41B.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index cba3bd0..e55689d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id spi_nor_ids[] = {
>>       { "mb85rs1mt", INFO(0x047f27, 0, 128 * 1024, 1, SPI_NOR_NO_ERASE) },
>>
>>       /* GigaDevice */
>> +     { "gd25q41b", INFO(0xc84013, 0, 64 * 1024,  8, SECT_4K) },
>>       { "gd25q32", INFO(0xc84016, 0, 64 * 1024,  64, SECT_4K) },
>>       { "gd25lq32c", INFO(0xc86016, 0, 64 * 1024,  64, SECT_4K) },
>>       { "gd25q64", INFO(0xc84017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
>> @@ -601,6 +602,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id spi_nor_ids[] = {
>>       /* PMC */
>>       { "pm25lv512",   INFO(0,        0, 32 * 1024,    2, SECT_4K_PMC) },
>>       { "pm25lv010",   INFO(0,        0, 32 * 1024,    4, SECT_4K_PMC) },
>> +     { "pm25ld020",   INFO(0x7f9d22, 0, 64 * 1024,    4, SECT_4K) },
>>       { "pm25lq032",   INFO(0x7f9d46, 0, 64 * 1024,   64, SECT_4K) },
>>
>>       /* Spansion -- single (large) sector size only, at least
>
> You might want to split this into two patches, but see my comment on 1/2
> and please wait for Brian's confirmation there before you do anything.

Since these flashes are from 2 different vendors, it may make sense to
use 2 separated patches. I don't care too much however.

Adding these entries is OK in general.

-- 
Rafał