[PATCH V4] mtd: gpmi: fix the bitflips for erased page

[Brian Norris]

(+ Pekon for real this time! Sorry for the noise)

Pekon, please note the question directed to you (and others) below.

And in case you're missing the actual patch context:

  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-January/051513.html

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:56:15PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> + Pekon (he's doing something similar in OMAP NAND)
> 
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 08:47:07AM +0100, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Huang Shijie <b32955 at freescale.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:47:18PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > > Just a ping.
> > >
> > > could you merge this patch?
> > 
> > Also a ping from my side, I'm also a demanding party for a solution
> > for this issue, and I'm also waiting for a solution to get applied
> > upstream to integrate it into my board.
> 
> Hmm, I'm not terribly opposed to this patch, but you, Pekon, and I
> (in my local driver) are all doing something very similar, and I believe
> Pekon has gotten the logic wrong one or more times. I believe I actually
> have a version of this type of patch locally that could probably be put
> into the nand_base layer, with a flag so that drivers could request the
> check themselves (something like chip->options |=
> NAND_NEED_FF_ECC_CHECK; or pick your own name!).
> 
> What do you think? All interested parties please chime in. I can try to
> push a patch out soon for you all to test soon, or else I can see about
> taking your patches as-is for now, then try to unify them myself
> afterward.

Thanks,
Brian