No pull for mtd?

[Brian Norris]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Huang Shijie <shijie8 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:04:08PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 08:22 -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> > I really envy the other maillist, you can get response in several
>> > days.
>>
>> Well, yes. MTD is a small and (IMHO) a veeery slowly dying subsystem.
> I am not sure it is dying, but there are still so many patches pending
> in the maillist.

Dying or not (it certainly doesn't have its youthful vigor ATM), I
agree with Huang that the current response time is not sufficient for
the current level of contribution.

>> Brian was one of those who did great job in MTD overall, especially in
>> the NAND framework. He reviewed others patches. But even Brian got
>> silent lately.
> I think he feels frastrated too. :)

Slowness certainly helps divert my attention to other things (for
instance, I'll send a patch series, then forget about it for a while,
due to no review/response). But on the flipside, I will admit that I
have not always been proactive on reviewing others' work. But that can
change, especially if there's an incentive that my review will
actually mean quicker acceptance and progress.

Brian