[PATCH] mtd/nand: don't use {read,write}_buf for 8-bit transfers
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Thu Feb 28 05:48:19 EST 2013
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:47:43AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> 于 2013年02月27日 23:10, Uwe Kleine-König 写道:
> >According to the Open NAND Flash Interface Specification (ONFI) Revision
> >3.1 "Parameters are always transferred on the lower 8-bits of the data
> >bus." for the Get Features and Set Features commands.
> >
> yes. the set/get features should works in 8-bit.
>
> I have never met a 16-bit onfi nand yet. :)
>
> >So using read_buf and write_buf is wrong for 16-bit wide nand chips as
> >they use I/O[15:0]. The Get Features command is easily fixed using 4
> >times the read_byte callback. For Set Features error out as there is no
> yes. for get features, it's easy to fix it.
> >write_byte callback.
> Most of the time, the nand controller will overwrite the write_buf hook...
> I also think we need a write_byte callback.
a default implementation could be something like that:
static void nand_write_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t byte)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)
chip->write_buf(mtd, (uint8_t[]){ byte, 0 }, 2);
else
chip->write_buf(mtd, &byte, 1);
}
(Is this the correct order in the array? Or might that depend on
endianess?)
Does this look right?
Alternatively something could be done with chip->cmd_ctrl (but it seems
not all drivers implement this, e.g. mxc_nand doesn't).
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list