[patch] Adding Secure Deletion to UBIFS

Artem Bityutskiy dedekind1 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 14 06:27:15 EDT 2012


On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 11:20 +0100, Joel Reardon wrote:
> For removing the key scheme notion, is it correct to remove:
> UBIFS_KEY_MAX_LEN and UBIFS_SK_, UBIFS_S_KEY_BLOCK_BITS, ... and replace
> it with a fixed UBIFS_KEY_LEN (and other values), thus also ignoring
> key_fmt in key_max_inode_size and simply use a fixed key scheme? Or should
> I simply reduce MAX_LEN to 8 but still allow multiple bit assignments
> within those 8 bytes via selecting a different key_fmt.

Yes, sounds reasonable.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120314/fba3c20e/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the linux-mtd mailing list