[PATCH mtd-www] UBI FAQ: suggest omission of vol_size option

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 22:27 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> OLPC set vol_size based on the size of the target NAND and found out
> that it resulted in some systems being unbootable, where such systems
> had a lot of bad blocks on their flash.
> 
> For distributors such as OLPC wishing to maximize robustness in the
> face of varying bad block counts, it makes a lot of sense to avoid
> the vol_size option and let it be calculated automatically.
> Document this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org>

Pushed both to mtd-www, thanks a lot!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120413/4a187b08/attachment.sig>