Query mtd-utils v1.4.9 : flash_erase.c

[Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579]

Thanks Mike for the reply!!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vapier.adi at gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 10:32 PM
> To: Brian Norris
> Cc: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579; Wood Scott-B07421; linux-
> mtd at lists.infradead.org; Artem Bityutskiy
> Subject: Re: Query mtd-utils v1.4.9 : flash_erase.c
> 
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 20:52, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 wrote:
> >> Is there any plan to support MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB in future in-case
> somebody send patch?
> >
> > At this point, I'd hope others might speak up. Personally, I don't see
> > why we couldn't accept patch(es) if they are reviewed and tested
> > properly. I don't know of a "plan."
> 
> if you cc-ed me in case of a plan, then i don't know of any ;)
> 
> mtd (kernel and user) has always seemed like it moves forward as people
> have needs and send [good] patches to fulfill those needs -mike

Yes I am fully agree. I have a question about few patches send long back by "Stanley Miao".
They are as follows:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/56261/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/56262/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/56263/

These patches were never delegated/applied as state are still "New". 

These patches can become a good base for new patches.  

Do anyone has any idea; why were these never applied/delegated?

--Prabhakar