dangerous NAND_BBT_SCANBYTE1AND6

[Ricard Wanderlof]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Matthieu CASTET wrote:

>> So I bet
>> your device is actually an x8 device and so the 1st/6th byte pattern is
>> correct. I think the fact that this conflicts with your ECC patterns is
>> something you must deal with.
> I don't agree, that's a big mtd regression. If you update your kernel on such
> flash, you brick it.

I agree, even if the behavior may have been incorrect in the past, we 
should think very carefully about changing this for exactly this reason.

/Ricard
-- 
Ricard Wolf Wanderlöf                           ricardw(at)axis.com
Axis Communications AB, Lund, Sweden            www.axis.com
Phone +46 46 272 2016                           Fax +46 46 13 61 30