[PATCH 1/2] P4080/eLBC: Make Freescale elbc interrupt common to elbc devices

[Kumar Gala]

On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:12 AM, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote:

> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak at kernel.crashing.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 21:19 PM
>> To: Zang Roy-R61911
>> Cc: linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> dedekind1 at gmail.com; Lan
>> Chunhe-B25806; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org; akpm at linux-foundation.org;
>> dwmw2 at infradead.org; Gala Kumar-B11780
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] P4080/eLBC: Make Freescale elbc interrupt
> common to
>> elbc devices
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:22 AM, Roy Zang wrote:
>> 
>>> Move Freescale elbc interrupt from nand dirver to elbc driver.
>>> Then all elbc devices can use the interrupt instead of ONLY nand.
>>> 
>>> For former nand driver, it had the two functions:
>>> 
>>> 1. detecting nand flash partitions;
>>> 2. registering elbc interrupt.
>>> 
>>> Now, second function is removed to fsl_lbc.c.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Lan Chunhe-B25806 <b25806 at freescale.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang at freescale.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421 at freescale.com>
>>> ---
>> 
>> Roy, this is a nit, but are these really p4080 specific?  just
> wondering why
>> the subject is P4080/eLBC:...
> We start these code in P4080 project. Some customer want to track eLBC
> error on P4080, but some of the code is limited in nand driver only ...
> That is why P4080/eLBC ...
> Roy

sure, but is anything about these patches p4080 specific?

- k