[Help] SST39VF6401B Support

[yidong zhang]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:00:46PM +0800, yidong zhang wrote:
>> hi
>>    The 39VF*-B-Version flashes in the cfi_nopri_fixup_table don't work
>> well in the current code.  Because of the mistaken use of
>> command(0x30) in the 6th bus cycle, which should be 0x50. I think the
>> 39VF*-B-Version flashes should be removed form the CFI probe mode. Or
>> maybe the erase operation should be changed for the Compatibility.
>
> Or we put in a variable like the unlock-address?

Maybe that's a better solution. I have no other methods.


>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAky8Mk8ACgkQD27XaX1/VRtD1QCgvhKREHwzceC1STdpZXJ2qrum
> Wg4An0JXJSQTkr5eShXUdykOn6lhlvbt
> =3BkZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>