[Help] SST39VF6401B Support

[Wolfram Sang]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:00:46PM +0800, yidong zhang wrote:
> hi
>    The 39VF*-B-Version flashes in the cfi_nopri_fixup_table don't work
> well in the current code.  Because of the mistaken use of
> command(0x30) in the 6th bus cycle, which should be 0x50. I think the
> 39VF*-B-Version flashes should be removed form the CFI probe mode. Or
> maybe the erase operation should be changed for the Compatibility.

Or we put in a variable like the unlock-address?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20101018/717575df/attachment.sig>