[Help] SST39VF6401B Support

[Wolfram Sang]

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 08:25:44PM +0800, yidong zhang wrote:
> Hi
>   Thanks for your reply. In the cfi_nopri_fixup_table, i added the
> below code as you did.
> { CFI_MFR_SST, 0x236D, fixup_sst39vf_rev_b, NULL, }, // SST39VF6401B

OK, please just use C-style comments (I just sent another patch
converting the others). Also, would be nice if you could check the
datasheet for other IDs mentioned there and add them, too.

> And the flash can get detected. But i still have one confusion.
> According to the  data sheets Table 6, in the 6th bus write cycle.
> 39VF6401B uses 0x50 and 39VF6401 uses 0x30. If 39VF6401B uses 0x30 in

Ouch! Is this true for the other 39VF*-non-B and B-versions, too?

Adding Guillaume to CC...

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20101016/7f129cd3/attachment.sig>