Fix mtd-utils bugs

stanley.miao stanley.miao at windriver.com
Sun Jun 20 08:21:37 EDT 2010


Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:16 +0800, stanley.miao wrote:
>   
>> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 12:51 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:36 +0800, Stanley.Miao wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Please, make sure your submissions have proper version. I have limited
>>>> amount of time and do not want to spend it figuring out which patch is
>>>> the latest. Use the best kernel practices and apply prefix your stuff
>>>> with [PATCHv3] or something like that.
>>>>
>>>> Could you please re-submit your latest version?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Also, it is nice to put a short changelog, but I can live without it.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Is the subject of every emails is the short changelog you wanted ?
>>     
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I do not understand the question. I do not need changelogs. I
> just noted that there are best practices, and people use changelogs. You
> can take a look at lkml archives at patch series from good kernel
> hackers for example.
>
> If you asked whether the changelog should be in each patch - no, just in
> the "0" patch, and just short.
>   

Oh, Got it. I misunderstood the "short changelog" previously.
I have sent the V3.

Thanks
Stanley.
> Anyway, I just want you to re-send your up-to-date patches as a separate
> series with a v2 prefix.
>
>   




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list