Fix mtd-utils bugs
stanley.miao
stanley.miao at windriver.com
Sun Jun 20 08:21:37 EDT 2010
Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:16 +0800, stanley.miao wrote:
>
>> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 12:51 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:36 +0800, Stanley.Miao wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Please, make sure your submissions have proper version. I have limited
>>>> amount of time and do not want to spend it figuring out which patch is
>>>> the latest. Use the best kernel practices and apply prefix your stuff
>>>> with [PATCHv3] or something like that.
>>>>
>>>> Could you please re-submit your latest version?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Also, it is nice to put a short changelog, but I can live without it.
>>>
>>>
>> Is the subject of every emails is the short changelog you wanted ?
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I do not understand the question. I do not need changelogs. I
> just noted that there are best practices, and people use changelogs. You
> can take a look at lkml archives at patch series from good kernel
> hackers for example.
>
> If you asked whether the changelog should be in each patch - no, just in
> the "0" patch, and just short.
>
Oh, Got it. I misunderstood the "short changelog" previously.
I have sent the V3.
Thanks
Stanley.
> Anyway, I just want you to re-send your up-to-date patches as a separate
> series with a v2 prefix.
>
>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list