Fix mtd-utils bugs

Artem Bityutskiy dedekind1 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 18 06:24:23 EDT 2010


On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:16 +0800, stanley.miao wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 12:51 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >   
> >> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:36 +0800, Stanley.Miao wrote:
> >>     
> >>> <snip>
> >>>       
> >> Please, make sure your submissions have proper version. I have limited
> >> amount of time and do not want to spend it figuring out which patch is
> >> the latest. Use the best kernel practices and apply prefix your stuff
> >> with [PATCHv3] or something like that.
> >>
> >> Could you please re-submit your latest version?
> >>     
> >
> > Also, it is nice to put a short changelog, but I can live without it.
> >   
> 
> Is the subject of every emails is the short changelog you wanted ?

Hi,

Sorry, I do not understand the question. I do not need changelogs. I
just noted that there are best practices, and people use changelogs. You
can take a look at lkml archives at patch series from good kernel
hackers for example.

If you asked whether the changelog should be in each patch - no, just in
the "0" patch, and just short.

Anyway, I just want you to re-send your up-to-date patches as a separate
series with a v2 prefix.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list