[PATCH 0/2] Revised: MTD: OneNAND: multiblock erase support

[Mika Korhonen]

Bityutskiy Artem (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:55 +0300, Mika Korhonen wrote:
>   
>> This patch series is a reworked version of
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027138.html
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027139.html
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027140.html
>>
>> based on comments by Adrian Hunter and Kyungmin Park. This version should
>> address the issues pointed out by them and apply on the current mtd tree.
>>
>> The original patch is:
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-June/026130.html
>>
>> I split the original patch in two for readability: the first part extracts
>> the execution of erase command to a separate function for easier integration
>> of different erase method. The second part implements the multiblock erase
>> function in case multiple blocks are requested to be erased and the chip is
>> not Flex.
>>
>> This is useful for flashing applications that need to do their work as
>> fast as possible. For full 64 eraseblock case the erase speed is up to 30x
>> faster. (Samsung: 64 MB/s vs 2.1 GB/s, I got 1.4 GB/s on Linux kernel)
>>     
>
> Mika, I've tried to apply your patches to my tree, but they do not apply
> any more because of recent printk cleanups:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commit/297758f8fc4e92b1915d2f5f2f84cedfe8941e5a
>
> Could you please refresh your patches against the current MTD tree and
> re-send?
>   
There you are, I just resent them.

br,
Mika