[PATCH 0/2] Revised: MTD: OneNAND: multiblock erase support

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:55 +0300, Mika Korhonen wrote:
> This patch series is a reworked version of
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027138.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027139.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027140.html
> 
> based on comments by Adrian Hunter and Kyungmin Park. This version should
> address the issues pointed out by them and apply on the current mtd tree.
> 
> The original patch is:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-June/026130.html
> 
> I split the original patch in two for readability: the first part extracts
> the execution of erase command to a separate function for easier integration
> of different erase method. The second part implements the multiblock erase
> function in case multiple blocks are requested to be erased and the chip is
> not Flex.
> 
> This is useful for flashing applications that need to do their work as
> fast as possible. For full 64 eraseblock case the erase speed is up to 30x
> faster. (Samsung: 64 MB/s vs 2.1 GB/s, I got 1.4 GB/s on Linux kernel)

Mika, I've tried to apply your patches to my tree, but they do not apply
any more because of recent printk cleanups:

http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commit/297758f8fc4e92b1915d2f5f2f84cedfe8941e5a

Could you please refresh your patches against the current MTD tree and
re-send?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)