ubifs, ubiblk(formatted with vfat) and yaffs2 test.

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 22:00 +0900, KeunO Park wrote:
> > But I have to add that of course, YAFFS/JFFS2 are more light-weight
> > file-system, because they do not maintain the FS index on the flash
> > media. UBIFS does and this costs extra CPU cycles and extra I/O.
> >
> 
> actually I did write & fsync the file during test. :-)
> anyway thank you for your comment.

Could you please send your test? And how you measure the load average?

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)