Is there really need to build Block Device Emulation over UBI?

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 11:13 +0800, Nancy wrote:
> Hi,
>    Is there really need to build Block Device Emulation over UBI? Why
> can't use the mtd_blkdev.c and mtdblock.c directly?
>    Thanks to gluebi, make UBI and MTD become one. More interesting
> thing is,  volume can be treat like a mtd partition. mtdblock.c do not
> have wear-leveling and bad block management mechanism but UBI has.
> gluebi make all those functions mix together right?
>    I have tried, and it work.

Frankly, I am very busy now and have no time to review so much code.
Please, communicate via the mailing list instead. And please, send
patches instead of whole files.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)