[PATCH] LogFS take three

[Jamie Lokier]

Jörn Engel wrote:
> > Almost all your static functions start with logfs_, why not this one?
> 
> Because after a while I discovered how silly it is to start every
> function with logfs_.  That prefix doesn't add much unless the function
> has global scope.  What I didn't do was remove the prefix from older
> functions.

It's handy when debugging or showing detailed backtraces.  Not that
I'm advocating it (or not), just something I've noticed in other
programs.

-- Jamie