[PATCH] [MTD] NAND: Lazily BBT construction
Artem Bityutskiy
dedekind at infradead.org
Fri Nov 24 10:45:38 EST 2006
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 16:56 +0300, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
> Patch covers the case when there is no on-flash BBT and on-flash
> BBT wasn't requested
Right. So the idea was if your flash is small enough and you are
satisfied with scanning, you use scanning. If not, you use on-flash BBT.
> How can I use it?
I haven't actually used it. There is some flag you have to set in your
chip structure.
> Also when we have on-flash BBT we
> don't need to scan chip so we don't need lazily BBT.
Yes, I did not say this. I meant why don't you just switch to on-media
BBT instead of implementing this lazy scan stuff. Just curious.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list