[PATCH] [MTD] NAND: Lazily BBT construction

Artem Bityutskiy dedekind at infradead.org
Fri Nov 24 10:45:38 EST 2006


On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 16:56 +0300, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
> Patch covers the case when there is no on-flash BBT and on-flash
> BBT wasn't requested
Right. So the idea was if your flash is small enough and you are
satisfied with scanning, you use scanning. If not, you use on-flash BBT.

>  How can I use it? 
I haven't actually used it. There is some flag you have to set in your
chip structure.

> Also when we have on-flash BBT we
> don't need to scan chip so we don't need lazily BBT.

Yes, I did not say this. I meant why don't you just switch to on-media
BBT instead of implementing this lazy scan stuff. Just curious.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)





More information about the linux-mtd mailing list