On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 17:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Just using rubin compression on the summary nodes would save 35% (thus > they'd be 1.25% of total size) -- by reducing the average to 1708 > bytes per eraseblock. Sorry, that should be 30%. 1708 is 69.5% of 2457. -- dwmw2