[PATCH,RFC] [MTD] replace MTD_NORFLASH with MTD_GENERIC_TYPE

[Jörn Engel]

On Thu, 1 June 2006 13:03:10 +0400, Artem B. Bityutskiy wrote:
> 
> I bet you understand what I meant. I meant, that you may implement this 
> "layer" a way it'll have no overhead comparing to the way Joern offers. 
> May be layer is not the very appropriate word here. It's not like 
> network layers. I just wanted to put my idea in a bit different angle.

I don't understand how that layer would not introduce overhead.  But
maybe you have some explanation in diff -up format.  That would
certainly make things easier to understand.

Jörn

-- 
It's just what we asked for, but not what we want!
-- anonymous