[PATCH,RFC] [MTD] replace MTD_NORFLASH with MTD_GENERIC_TYPE

[Artem B. Bityutskiy]

Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> This is the fundamental differences between our views.
> 
> I just can't agree with the "additional layer makes no additional 
> overhead" assertion. Sorry.

Nicolas,

I bet you understand what I meant. I meant, that you may implement this 
"layer" a way it'll have no overhead comparing to the way Joern offers. 
May be layer is not the very appropriate word here. It's not like 
network layers. I just wanted to put my idea in a bit different angle.

I'd uderstood irony, but when you fetch a phrase from the context and 
out of this context it really looks weird, I don't know what is this. 
This is not an argument.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityutskiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.