[PATCH] [JFFS2] Make NAND OOB usage more flexible
forrest.zhao at intel.com
Thu Jan 5 21:20:00 EST 2006
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:29 +0300, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> no, the latest patch is
> It doesn't touch OneNAND but the required changes are so similar to
> common NAND that I don't think it's gonna be a problem to extend it
> OneNAND. I just didn't bother to; but the approach itself is quite
This is really wonderful. When I wrote EBH patch, Thomas told me
that he hope MTD layer could provide the virtually contiguous
free OOB area. Now it really happens.
I'll modify the OOB usage code in JFFS2 accordingly after you
finish the patch for OneNAND.
More information about the linux-mtd