Should we put jffs2_sum_marker into eraseblock_header?

[Artem B. Bityuckiy]

zhao forrest wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When writing the eraseblock_header patch, I found the current
> summary patch in MTD CVS place jffs2_sum_marker at the end of
> each erase block. Since jffs2_sum_marker is a per-eraseblock
> structure, should we put it into eraseblock_header when the
> eraseblock_header patch is ready in the future?
> 
Yes, it ought to go there IMO.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.