Should we put jffs2_sum_marker into eraseblock_header?

zhao forrest zhao_fusheng at
Tue Sep 13 06:39:33 EDT 2005


When writing the eraseblock_header patch, I found the current
summary patch in MTD CVS place jffs2_sum_marker at the end of
each erase block. Since jffs2_sum_marker is a per-eraseblock
structure, should we put it into eraseblock_header when the
eraseblock_header patch is ready in the future?


More information about the linux-mtd mailing list