clean marker size for NOR w/ECC
Josh Boyer
jdub at us.ibm.com
Wed Jun 22 14:20:15 EDT 2005
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 16:51 +0400, Timofey Kutergin wrote:
> yes, I agree - eccsize is smallest write size. Or size of region which
> can be written only once after block erase. What I meant was that if
> eccsize is greater than cleanmarker size, JFFS2 does not skip rest of
> first ECC region in block and tries to write data to it. This causes
> write failure. Therefore patch sets clean marker size to eccsize if
> eccsize is greater than 16.
IIRC, JFFS2 will pad the node to the correct size so write failure
shouldn't be an issue. I could be mistaken, it's been a while.
Is this a problem you are currently seeing, or is this all just
theoretical? To my knowledge, there are no other NOR ECC flash chips
out there. Even if there were, support would need to be added to MTD
before they could be used. We could adapt JFFS2 at that time if needs
be.
josh
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list