Suggestion: Give JFFS its own mail list.

Steve Wahl steve.wahl at
Wed Apr 20 10:39:58 EDT 2005

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:23:11PM +0400, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:40 -0400, Ian McDonnell wrote:
> > Is it time to give JFFS/JFFS2 a mail list of its own?
> > 
> > I am a user intested in MTD and below but not jffs, and
> > it seams like there's a lot of jffs adn jffs/mtd discussion on 
> > the MTD list.
> > 
> > Decoupling the two mail lists may indirectly help improve the 
> > MTD/mtd-clent (JFFS2,YAFFS,Char-IO/Block-IO) API by focusing
> > more on the abstract interface and less on application specifics.
> > 
> <stress>IMO<\stress>, the list is very low-volume to split it.
> Personally I have no problems seeing discussions of things to which I am
> not involved.

But actual MTD issues seem to get ignored, perhaps because the list is
so swampped with JFFS issues.

At least I think that's the reason I was completely ignored when I
posted (twice) about a bug with AMD 29LV800 parts (and thus gave

--> Steve

More information about the linux-mtd mailing list