Suggestion: Give JFFS its own mail list.

[Artem B. Bityuckiy]

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:40 -0400, Ian McDonnell wrote:
> Is it time to give JFFS/JFFS2 a mail list of its own?
> 
> I am a user intested in MTD and below but not jffs, and
> it seams like there's a lot of jffs adn jffs/mtd discussion on 
> the MTD list.
> 
> Decoupling the two mail lists may indirectly help improve the 
> MTD/mtd-clent (JFFS2,YAFFS,Char-IO/Block-IO) API by focusing
> more on the abstract interface and less on application specifics.
> 
<stress>IMO<\stress>, the list is very low-volume to split it.
Personally I have no problems seeing discussions of things to which I am
not involved.