Benchmarking JFFS2

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at
Thu Jan 23 07:09:55 EST 2003

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, jlavi at said:
>  Of course measuring write throughput is just one side of performance
> but I think it is fair to say JFFS2 write performane on dirty file
> system with low performance CPUs has improved dramatically since last
> spring.

Fancy repeating the test with current CVS? I just committed the 
oft-discussed code required to avoid decompressing and recompressing nodes 
which haven't changed -- and to avoid even doing the iget() and building up 
the node lists for the inodes to which they belong in that case too.


More information about the linux-mtd mailing list