JFFS2 for 2.0 kernel?
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Mon Feb 24 02:17:47 EST 2003
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 07:08, Arne Jonsson wrote:
> > Why do you want 2.0?
> We are using using JFFS with MTD and the uClinux 2.0.38 kernel. I have
> some concerns re. JFFS and powercycling and as I understand the JFFS2 is
> more robust. Another option would be to make JFFS more robust but I
> assume that that might be an even bigger challenge.
True. JFFS2 _is_ the result of making JFFS more robust. :)
What chance of using 2.4 uClinux?
More information about the linux-mtd