JFFS2 for 2.0 kernel?

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 07:08, Arne Jonsson wrote:
> > Why do you want 2.0?
> We are using using JFFS with MTD and the uClinux 2.0.38 kernel. I have
> some concerns re. JFFS and powercycling and as I understand the JFFS2 is
> more robust. Another option would be to make JFFS more robust but I
> assume that that might be an even bigger challenge.

True. JFFS2 _is_ the result of making JFFS more robust. :)

What chance of using 2.4 uClinux?

-- 
dwmw2