JFFS2 for 2.0 kernel?

[Arne Jonsson]

David Woodhouse wrote:

> It would be quite a lot of work; the file system layer in Linux changed
> dramatically between the 2.0 and 2.2 kernels. You'd have a better chance
> of porting to 2.2 -- in fact I think someone's already done so.
I was afraid of that, but we need the 2.0 kernel (at least for now).
 
> Why do you want 2.0?
We are using using JFFS with MTD and the uClinux 2.0.38 kernel. I have
some concerns re. JFFS and powercycling and as I understand the JFFS2 is
more robust. Another option would be to make JFFS more robust but I
assume that that might be an even bigger challenge.

Best regards,
/Arne Jonsson
-- 
Arne Jonsson
i3 micro technology AB
Phone:+46-8-506 388 00
Fax:  +46-8-506 388 75