seeking help on JFFS2

[Junping Zhang]

Jörn,

   I just tested 2.4.19 with shared-zlib patch, same behavior. I could use
the JFFS2 system,
but it will eventually crash after a while.

   The flash chip is original from Motorola: 8M, 80 pin SIMM, SM73228. I
used Christian's
map file. Since JFFS works on it without any problem, should I safely assume
the MTD layer
is correct?

    I appreciate your thought, but my company won't let me give people
direct access. I will
check out the latest MTD from cvs tonight and give it a try tomorrow.

    Thanks

-   Junping

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jörn Engel [SMTP:joern at wohnheim.fh-wedel.de]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:31 PM
> To:	Junping Zhang
> Cc:	linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org
> Subject:	Re: seeking help on JFFS2
> 
> On Tue, 5 November 2002 12:39:31 -0500, Junping Zhang wrote:
> > Yes, the minor number is 2, and I checked mkfs.jffs2 source, hex is ok.
> I
> > also tried with
> > the method you mentioned, the crashed happened right away.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > I just tried using the stock JFFS2 in 2.4.18 kernel. It actually got me
> > further than JFFS2
> > in my mtd-20021022 snapshot, I could use either image or direct mount to
> > create JFFS2,
> > but it still crashed under stress test. On the other hand, JFFS works
> quite
> > well.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > Does stock 2.4.19 have a stable JFFS2 without patch? I downloaded a
> > shared-zlib patch
> > for 2.4.19-pre10 but am not sure it will fix my JFFS2 problem.
> 
> 2.4.19 should have a stable jffs2, as should 2.4.18. You can try
> 2.4.19, but I don't expect any better behaviour.
> 
> What flashes do you exactly use? And can you provide ssh login to the
> development host?
> 
> Jörn
> 
> -- 
> If you're willing to restrict the flexibility of your approach,
> you can almost always do something better.
> -- John Carmack