Missing cache flush.

[kira brown]

On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:

>
> davem at redhat.com said:
> > Chris Wedgwood writes:
> > > What if the memory is erased underneath the CPU being aware of
> > > this? In such a way ig generates to bus traffic...
>
> > This doesn't happen on x86.  The processor snoops all transactions
> > done by other agents to/from main memory.  The processor caches are
> > always up to date.
>
> No. My original mail presented two situations in which this assumption is
> false.
>
> 1. Bank-switched RAM. You want to force a writeback before switching pages.
>    I _guarantee_ you that the CPU isn't snooping my access to the I/O port
>    which sets the latch that drives the upper few address bits of the RAM
>    chips.
>
> 2. Flash. A few writes of magic data to magic addresses and a whole erase
>    block suddenly contains 0xFF. The CPU doesn't notice that either.

3. Buggy implementations like the Cyrix 486es that don't properly maintain
   cache coherency.

kira.