MTD CVS update: 'mtd/kernel mtdblock.c'

Steven J. Hill sjhill at cotw.com
Tue Oct 24 07:46:02 EDT 2000


David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> *(int *)0=0; doesn't cause an oops on all platforms. That was why BUG() was
> introduced. Probably better just to omit my paranoia checks altogether,
> once we're happy that mtdblock actually works. For now, surround them in
> #ifdef PARANOIA. I thought I'd done that already.
> 
Alright, will do.

> DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED wants adding to compatmac.h if it's not already there.
> 
Will do.

> What was the reasoning for removing the 'static' from the declaration of
> thr_wq?
> 
Uhhh...that would be my stupidity. I forgot to put 'static' back on
the declaration.

-Steve

-- 
 Steven J. Hill - Embedded SW Engineer
 Public Key: 'finger sjhill at mail.cotw.com'
 FPR1: E124 6E1C AF8E 7802 A815
 FPR2: 7D72 829C 3386 4C4A E17D


To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list