David.Woodhouse at mvhi.com
Thu Jul 8 11:06:45 EDT 1999
David.Woodhouse at mvhi.com said:
> now we're talking, and they seem fairly genuinely willing to work with
> us to find a solution to the problem. It seems as if we'll be able to
> reach an agreement fairly soon. I certainly hope so.
They seem to be labouring under the impression that they risking losing their
intellectual property if they allow drivers to be released under GPL.
There are two aspect to it: firstly the actual hardware interface to the
Disk-On-Chip, and secondly the NFTL filesystem.
Looking at the hardware interface first: M-Systems seem to believe that the
availability of driver source code would allow competitors to duplicate their
This is insane, because the hardware is covered by numerous patents (search for
M-Systems on www.patents.ibm.com and you'll see them). So they've got no real
reason for believing that their hardware would be duplicated.
Quite frankly, I believe it would be easier to reproduce the hardware from the
patents than it would from the driver software. Either way, it would be fairly
difficult. You can't just look at the overview or the interface and
automatically get all the details of the ASIC right first time, without
spending months ironing out the bugs.
With NFTL, their position is slightly more understandable - but only slightly.
They don't want their filesystem to be used on other manufacturers' hardware,
which is understandable. But I don't agree that there's a problem with having
a GPL'd version.
There's already a GPL'd implementation of FTL, their original flash filesystem.
They hold patents on it, and it's restricted for use only with PCMCIA devices.
Any competing manufacturer who sold devices using FTL would be in violation of
the patents. Exactly the same would happen with NFTL - so they have no reason
to be concerned about releasing a GPL'd version of NFTL either.
I'm trying to keep the two separate, and concentrate on the first - if we can
drive the Disk-On-Chip hardware, then we can put another filesystem on it. But
if we can't, there's no chance of it being useful at all.
Having NFTL would also be useful, because it would allow interoperation
between Linux and other operating systems on the device, but in practice
you're unlikely to want a dual-boot system on the Disk-On-Chip, so it's not
the end of the world if we don't get it. Of course, there's no reason for them
to withold it, but I'm concentrating on the hardware interface first.
---- ---- ----
David Woodhouse David.Woodhouse at mvhi.com Office: (+44) 1223 810302
Project Leader, Process Information Systems Mobile: (+44) 976 658355
Axiom (Cambridge) Ltd., Swaffham Bulbeck, Cambridge, CB5 0NA, UK.
finger dwmw2 at ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk for PGP key.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at imladris.demon.co.uk
More information about the linux-mtd