[PATCH v1 6/7] drm/ci: uprev IGT

Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov at oss.qualcomm.com
Tue Jan 27 06:25:56 PST 2026


On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 06:26:11PM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On 27/01/26 18:01, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 04:14:01PM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote:
> > > Recent IGT [1] seems to be broken on MSM hardware, with many tests
> > > failing due to the old_primary->index != 0 assertion. Uprev IGT to
> > > the last known good revision where the tests pass, and update the
> > > expectation files accordingly.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/-/commit/a909ab05
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman at collabora.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at oss.qualcomm.com>
> > 
> > It is not clear, which parts here are due to Mesa uprev (yes, there are
> > some of those) and which are due to the IGT uprev. Please split into two
> > commits and make sure that Mesa-uprev passes more or less clearly.
> 
> The mesa uprev and the IGT uprev are already split into two separate
> commits. The IGT uprev only updates the IGT version in gitlab-ci.yml and
> xfails.

I think I was not clear enough: Mesa uprev also causes some of the
xfails. Those needs to be a part of the Mesa uprev commit.


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



More information about the Linux-mediatek mailing list